Appeals in the New York State Appellate Division: How does a Motion for Reargument differ from a Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals?

Although both a Motion for Reargument and a Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals seek further review of an appeal, the two types of motions request a different court to make that review. With a Motion for Reargument, the party is seeking the appeal to remain in the Appellate Division, while, with the Motion for Leave to Appeal, the party is requesting that a new court address the issues.

Neither a Motion for Reargument nor a Motion for Leave to Appeal should simply rehash your appellate brief or affirmation. Further, neither motion should introduce new points or arguments regarding your appeal. Instead, the purpose is to explain to the court the reasons why further consideration of the appeal is warranted.

In a Motion for Reargument, a party should explain to the Appellate Division the reasons that the panel was incorrect in its decision. Thus, the motion should highlight what the court overlooked or misapprehended when making its decision. References should be made to the specific parts of the record on appeal or appendix that highlight these errors.

A Motion for Leave to Appeal may include the same considerations. However, this motion should also explain why the questions presented merit review by the highest court in New York. The Court of Appeals Rules of Practice § 500.22(b)(4) identifies the following issues as ones that might merit review:

• issues that are novel or of public importance.
• issues that present a conflict with prior decisions of the Court.
• issues that involve a conflict among departments of the Appellate Division.

The Court of Appeals does not generally review issues of fact. Thus, in a Motion for Leave to Appeal, a party must highlight the questions of law that it believes the court should review.

Practitioners should be aware of timing issues with regards to filing each of these motions. In some courts, a Motion for Reargument may have a different time limit than a Motion for Leave to Appeal.

Read related articles:
Appeals in the New York State Appellate Division: Adverse Decision? What Now? (Part I)
Appeals in the New York State Appellate Division: Adverse Decision? What Now? (Part II)

Tagged: Appellate Practice, New York State Court of Appeals, Appellate Procedure


 
 

CP Legal Research Group Appellate Practice Litigation Real Estate Oral Argument Foreclosure Practice Appellate Services History Supreme Court of the United States Production & Support California Court of Appeal New York State Appellate Division Third Department New York State Appellate Division Fourth Department United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Appellate Procedure New York State Appellate Division First Department New York State Appellate Division Second Department New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division The Appellate Law Journal United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Supreme Court of Pennsylvania New York State Court of Appeals Supreme Court of California United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Supreme Court of Virginia Court of Appeals of Virginia United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Supreme Court of New Jersey Superior Court of Pennsylvania Supreme Court of Illinois The Maryland Court of Appeals United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit United State Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit Supreme Court of the State of New York Condo & COOP Court Technology Electronic Briefs